ECZ must be fair, firm and decisive in dealing with violent political parties
POLITICSBy News Diggers — News Diggers
LUSAKA – The Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ) is facing mounting pressure from various stakeholders to demonstrate unwavering fairness, firmness, and decisiveness in its handling of political parties implicated in violence. This urgent call comes amidst growing concerns over the potential for electoral unrest as the country approaches future by-elections and the crucial 2026 general election, with observers keen on fostering an environment conducive to democratic participation. Political analysts and civil society organisations have consistently highlighted the critical role of the ECZ in upholding the integrity of Zambia's democratic processes. They argue that any perceived leniency or inconsistency in addressing political thuggery undermines public confidence in the electoral body and, by extension, the entire electoral system. The expectation is that the ECZ will not only condemn acts of violence but also implement stringent measures, including disqualifications and legal referrals, to deter future occurrences. Historically, Zambia has grappled with instances of political violence, often escalating during campaign periods. These episodes have, at times, led to voter apathy, disrupted campaigns, and cast shadows over election outcomes. The current appeal to the ECZ is therefore a proactive measure aimed at breaking this cycle, ensuring that political discourse remains focused on policy and national development rather than intimidation and physical altercations. The commission's ability to enforce its regulations impartially is seen as paramount to achieving this. Furthermore, the call for decisiveness extends to the enforcement of the Electoral Code of Conduct. Critics suggest that while the code exists, its application has sometimes been selective or lacked the necessary punitive measures to act as a true deterrent. A firm stance by the ECZ would involve swift investigations into reported incidents, transparent disciplinary actions, and clear communication