Supply vulnerabilities drive illicit tobacco trade – TCDI

BUSINESS

By NKOMBO KACHEMBA — Zambia Daily Mail

Supply vulnerabilities drive illicit tobacco trade – TCDI
Data obtained from the Tobacco Control Data Initiative (TCDI) dashboard indicates that the prevalence of illicit cigarettes in Zambia stands at 12.2 percent, positioning the country at a lower rate compared to several regional counterparts. Recent figures place illicit cigarette prevalence considerably higher in nations such as South Africa at 58 percent, Ethiopia at 45.4 percent, Nigeria at 25 percent, and Ghana at 20 percent. Conversely, Zambia's figures remain higher than those registered in Kenya, Senegal, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. These empirical insights stem from comprehensive empty-pack surveys spanning all ten provinces, shedding light on systemic supply vulnerabilities. The findings draw from an extensive 2022 illicit cigarette empty-pack survey that evaluated 118,344 cigarette packs gathered systematically from retailers, streets, and waste bins across 25 districts. Out of this sample, approximately 14,428 packs failed compliance criteria, lacking mandatory Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA) tax stamps, proper textual health warnings, or featuring unauthorized duty-free markers. Most notably, the data highlights a stark contrast between domestic and foreign products: only 3.2 percent of locally manufactured cigarettes fell into the illicit category, compared to a staggering 61.7 percent of imported alternatives. According to rigorous TCDI analyses, the persistence of the illicit tobacco trade is driven less by high tax regimes and more by enforcement gaps and vulnerabilities within regional supply chains. These trends were unpacked during specialized media training workshops designed to equip journalists across eastern and southern Africa with tools for evidence-based reporting. Experts emphasized that porous borders and logistical loopholes allow untaxed and substandard products to infiltrate local retail markets, undercutting state revenue and public health objectives. Public health advocates and trade watchdogs point out that revenue leakage