Where Is Binwell Mpundu? His Absence Deepens Questions About Accountability and Due Process

POLITICS

By Thomas Moyo — Zambian Observer

Where Is Binwell Mpundu? His Absence Deepens Questions About Accountability and Due Process
The whereabouts of former Nkana Independent Member of Parliament Binwell Mpundu have become a subject of intense national discussion following his failure to appear before the Lusaka Magistrates' Court. Mpundu, who is facing a charge of seditious practices contrary to the Penal Code, was expected to attend court for a crucial ruling on whether he has a case to answer. However, his unannounced absence prompted Resident Magistrate Webster Milumbe to order his sureties—former Kamfinsa MP Christopher Kang'ombe and former Chilubi MP Mulenga Fube—to appear before the court to account for the missing politician. Defence counsel Norman Siwila informed the court that all attempts to reach the former lawmaker on his known mobile numbers had failed, leaving his immediate location entirely unknown. The state prosecution team noted that while court records previously necessitated a bench warrant in connection with Mpundu, they urged the court to exercise measured caution before invoking harsher legal penalties, requesting that the sureties be given an opportunity to explain. Consequently, the court has set September 17, 2026, as the date for the sureties to formally address the bench, warning that further non-appearance could trigger severe legal consequences. The unfolding legal drama has sent shockwaves through Zambia’s political landscape, drawing sharp divisions among citizens and legal observers alike. Mpundu, an outspoken critic and prominent opposition voice, has frequently found himself at odds with state machinery. The charges against him stem from social media publications that authorities argue crossed the threshold of public safety and promoted civil disobedience. For supporters, his legal troubles represent a systematic pattern of political intimidation designed to silence dissenting voices under the guise of maintaining law and order. Conversely, state authorities and legal purists maintain that the law must apply universally, regardless of political standing. T